导航：首页 > 数据库 >

oracle如何查找一段时间内的非绑定变量sql

发表于：2026-10-31 作者：千家信息网编辑

千家信息网最后更新 2026年10月31日，这篇文章主要介绍了oracle如何查找一段时间内的非绑定变量sql，具有一定借鉴价值，感兴趣的朋友可以参考下，希望大家阅读完这篇文章之后大有收获，下面让小编带着大家一起了解一下。查找一段时间内的非绑定

千家信息网最后更新 2026年10月31日oracle如何查找一段时间内的非绑定变量sql

这篇文章主要介绍了oracle如何查找一段时间内的非绑定变量sql，具有一定借鉴价值，感兴趣的朋友可以参考下，希望大家阅读完这篇文章之后大有收获，下面让小编带着大家一起了解一下。

查找一段时间内的非绑定变量sql的方法
v$SQL动态性能视图中的FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE列，可以帮助我们快速定位到非绑定变量的sql。该列的含义是"The signature used when the CURSOR_SHARING parameter is set to FORCE".意思就是如果将CURSOR_SHARING参数设置为force，sql文本在该参数下计算得到一个signature值。具有相同signature值的sql，oracle认为是可以通过绑定变量的办法共享游标，减小硬解析的。

查询一段时间内的非绑定变量sql
当数据库出现硬解析的时候，也可以用下面的语句去抓问题sql
也可以把时间约束条件去掉，单纯的找数据库所有时段的非绑定变量sql。
select * from v$sql where FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE in (select a.FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE from (
select to_char(FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE) FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE,
count(1) counts
from v$sql
where FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE > 0
and FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE <> EXACT_MATCHING_SIGNATURE
and EXECUTIONS <= 5
and to_date(last_load_time, 'yyyy-mm-dd/hh34:mi:ss') between
to_date('20180816 00:00:00', 'yyyy-mm-dd/hh34:mi:ss') and
to_date('20180816 01:00:00', 'yyyy-mm-dd/hh34:mi:ss')
group by FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE
having count(1) > 100
order by 2 desc) a) ;

可以用上面的sql换掉之前老旧的
SELECT substr(sql_text, 1, 60), count(1)
FROM v$sql
GROUP BY substr(sql_text, 1, 60)
HAVING count(1) > 10
ORDER BY 2;
这条sql的思路基本就是截取where条件之前的sql文本，因为可共享的sql不同之处就在于where条件上。

还有一个脚本，但是那个脚本执行速度缓慢，执行结果可读性差，like this
SQL> @find_literal.sql
Literal:select null from optstat_hist_control$ where sn address: 0000000082C6AA78
Literal:select sd.inst_id, ts.tsnam, segment_file, segment_block, ex address: 0000000085ADE880
Literal:SELECT S.SCHEMA, S.QUEUE_ID, S.SUBSCRIBER_ID, S.QUEUE_NAME, address: 0000000080198268
Literal:SELECT /*+ qb_name(gv_ashv) no_merge ordered use_nl(s,a) */ address: 0000000085B690F0
Literal:select NUM , NAME , TYPE , VALUE , DISPLAY_VALUE, DEFAULT_V address: 000000007845B490
Literal:select count(*) from undo$ address: 00000000839B7D30
Literal:select inst_id, kqlfxpl_phad, kqlfxpl_hash address: 0000000070CB2458
Literal:select tsn, tsv from x$ktfbnstat where flag = 1 address: 0000000083FDFBC0
Literal:select FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE, count(1) from v$sql wher address: 000000006AC3DD48
Literal:SELECT /*+ NO_STATEMENT_QUEUING RESULT_CACHE (SYSOBJ=TRUE) * address: 0000000080E6E4E8
Literal:select s.inst_id,s.addr,s.indx,s.ksuseser,s.ksuudses,s.ksuse address: 000000007AA44288
Literal:select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23708 address: 0000000076DCE188
Literal:select max(FA#) from SYS_FBA_FA address: 0000000087A37A90
Literal:SELECT CHAR_VALUE FROM SYSTEM.PRODUCT_PRIVS WHERE (UPPER(' address: 00000000792A3F20
Literal:select sid, db_sid, serial#, con_id from gv$xs_sessions whe address: 00000000675FF790
Literal:select count(*) from SYS.chnf$_reg_queries address: 0000000087B8B7E8
Literal:SELECT DECODE('A','A','1','2') FROM SYS.DUAL address: 0000000077B63FE8
Literal:select sql_id,child_number,open_versions,PARSE_CALLS,IS_OBSO address: 0000000072F2B578
Literal:SELECT INST_ID, USERID, OBJID, ID_TYPE, NAME, DECODE address: 0000000065CE9BB8
Literal:select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23731 address: 00000000736ED5B0
Literal:select x.inst_id,x.indx+1,ksppinm,ksppity,ksppstvl, ksppstdv address: 0000000069A7C248
Literal:select sum(used_blocks), ts.ts# from GV$SORT_SEGMENT gv, t address: 0000000083FC9870
Literal:SELECT /*+ OPT_PARAM('_parallel_syspls_obey_force' 'false') address: 0000000082CEC6C0
Literal:SELECT DECODE(USER, 'XS$NULL', XS_SYS_CONTEXT('XS$SESSION', address: 0000000065184210
Literal:select ts#, inc# from ts$ where online$=1 and bitand(flags,1 address: 0000000083FD0918
Literal:SELECT ATTRIBUTE,SCOPE,NUMERIC_VALUE,CHAR_VALUE,DATE_VALUE F address: 000000006B90E120
Literal:select sql_text, FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE, EXACT_MATCHING_SI address: 000000008784F698
Literal:select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID='23731' address: 00000000619F2018
Literal:select max(scn) from smon_scn_time address: 000000008399B9C8
Literal:SELECT /*+ NO_STATEMENT_QUEUING RESULT_CACHE (SYSOBJ=TRUE) * address: 0000000080F15FC8
Literal:select inst_id, sessid, dbsessnum, dbsernum, con_id from x$x address: 000000007BF4F150
Literal:SELECT /*+ NO_STATEMENT_QUEUING RESULT_CACHE (SYSOBJ=TRUE) * address: 0000000080E25790
Literal:select sql_text from v$sql where FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE in address: 00000000675B9180
Literal:select decode(u.type#, 2, u.ext_username, u.name), o.name, address: 00000000839D58F8
Literal:select ks.inst_id,ksuxsins,ksuxssid,ksuxshst,ksuxsver,ksuxst address: 000000007799CD88
Literal:select sql_id,sql_text,child_number,open_versions,PARSE_CALL address: 00000000709E5730

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

实验过程

SQL> conn ming/oracle@mingpdb1
Connected.
SQL> sho user con_name
USER is "MING"

CON_NAME
------------------------------
MINGPDB1

alter system flush shared_pool;
SQL> sho parameter cursor_shar

NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
cursor_sharing string EXACT

执行：
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23731;
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23708;
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID='23731';

set line 300
col SQL_TEXT for a55
col FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE for 999999999999999999999
col EXACT_MATCHING_SIGNATURE for 999999999999999999999
select sql_text, FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE, EXACT_MATCHING_SIGNATURE
FROM V$SQL
WHERE sql_text like '%test%'
and sql_text not like '%like%';
SQL_TEXT FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE EXACT_MATCHING_SIGNATURE
------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID='23731' 13459100552049599574 16467051488950643767
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23731 13459100552049599574 5586102026751624810
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23708 13459100552049599574 636726165116306616

可以看到涉及到隐式转换以及不同的值的sql，oracle认为都是可以通过设置CURSOR_SHARING为force解决游标不能共享的问题的。

实际生产上，count(*)大于的数需要改的大一点。
select FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE, count(1)
from v$sql
where FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE > 0
and FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE != EXACT_MATCHING_SIGNATURE
group by FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE
having count(1) > 1
order by 2;
FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE COUNT(1)
------------------------ ----------
13389370700329599909 2
13459100552049599574 3

根据上面结果继续查找：
SQL> select sql_text from v$sql where FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE in ('13389370700329599909','13459100552049599574');

SQL_TEXT
-------------------------------------------------------
SELECT SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','cdb_name') FROM DUAL
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID='23731'
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23731
select /*test*/ * from t_flash where OBJECT_ID=23708
SELECT SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','con_id') FROM DUAL

13459100552049599574对应的3，就是实验中发起的三条sql了。