导航：首页 > 服务器 >

如何理解ADD和DROP分区

发表于：2026-11-01 作者：千家信息网编辑

千家信息网最后更新 2026年11月01日，如何理解ADD和DROP分区，针对这个问题，这篇文章详细介绍了相对应的分析和解答，希望可以帮助更多想解决这个问题的小伙伴找到更简单易行的方法。add和drop分区语法：ALTER TABLE t_pe

千家信息网最后更新 2026年11月01日如何理解ADD和DROP分区

如何理解ADD和DROP分区，针对这个问题，这篇文章详细介绍了相对应的分析和解答，希望可以帮助更多想解决这个问题的小伙伴找到更简单易行的方法。

add和drop分区
语法：
ALTER TABLE t_pe_r
ADD PARTITION p4 VALUES LESS THAN (30 );
ALTER TABLE t_pe_l
ADD PARTITION p4 VALUES (30 );
ALTER TABLE t_pe_h
ADD PARTITION p3;

alter table t_pe_r drop partition p3;

限制：如果范围分区使用maxvalue选项则报错ORA-14074: 分区界限必须调整为高于最后一个分区界限
如果LIST分区使用了default选项则报错ORA-14323: 在 DEFAULT 分区已存在时无法添加分区
drop 分区不能使用在HASH分区表中，报错ORA-14255: 未按范围, 组合范围或列表方法对表进行分区

我们这里讨论HASH、list、range 3方式下add partition和drop partition关于local索引，global索引和普通索引的状态。
使用脚本
drop table t_pe_r ;
drop table t_pe_l;
drop table t_pe_h;
CREATE TABLE t_pe_r (i NUMBER, j NUMBER , f varchar2(20),k varchar2(20))
PARTITION BY RANGE(j)
(PARTITION p1 VALUES LESS THAN (10),
PARTITION p2 VALUES LESS THAN (20));
create index t_pe_r_n on t_pe_r(i);
create index t_pe_r_l on t_pe_r(j) local;
create index t_pe_r_g on t_pe_r(f)
GLOBAL PARTITION BY hash (f)
(partition pg1 ,
partition pg2);

CREATE TABLE t_pe_l (i NUMBER, j NUMBER , f varchar2(20),k varchar2(20))
PARTITION BY list (j)
(PARTITION p1 VALUES (10),
PARTITION p2 VALUES (20));
create index t_pe_l_n on t_pe_l(i);
create index t_pe_l_l on t_pe_l(j) local;
create index t_pe_l_g on t_pe_l(f)
GLOBAL PARTITION BY hash (f)
(partition pg1 ,
partition pg2);

CREATE TABLE t_pe_h (i NUMBER, j NUMBER , f varchar2(20),k varchar2(20))
PARTITION BY hash(j)
(PARTITION p1 ,
PARTITION p2 );
create index t_pe_h_n on t_pe_h(i);
create index t_pe_h_l on t_pe_h(j) local;
create index t_pe_h_g on t_pe_h(f)
GLOBAL PARTITION BY hash (f)
(partition pg1 ,
partition pg2);

insert into t_pe_r
values(2,5,'a','A');
insert into t_pe_r
values(1,15,'b','B');
insert into t_pe_l
values(2,10,'a','A');
insert into t_pe_l
values(1,20,'b','B');
insert into t_pe_h
values(2,5,'a','A');
insert into t_pe_h
values(1,15,'b','B');
insert into t_pe_h
values(3,25,'c','C');

select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_l';
select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_g';
select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_n';

select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_l';
select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_g';
select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_n';

select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_h_l';
select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_h_g';
select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_h_n';
下面进行添加
ALTER TABLE t_pe_r
ADD PARTITION p4 VALUES LESS THAN (30 );
ALTER TABLE t_pe_l
ADD PARTITION p4 VALUES (30 );
ALTER TABLE t_pe_h
ADD PARTITION p3;

然后查看索引状态
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_l';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_R_L USABLE P2
T_PE_R_L USABLE P1
T_PE_R_L USABLE P4
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_g';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_R_G USABLE PG2
T_PE_R_G USABLE PG1
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_n';

INDEX_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ --------
T_PE_R_N VALID
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_l';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_L_L USABLE P2
T_PE_L_L USABLE P1
T_PE_L_L USABLE P4
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_g';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_L_G USABLE PG2
T_PE_L_G USABLE PG1
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_n';

INDEX_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ --------
T_PE_L_N VALID
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_h_l';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_H_L USABLE P2
T_PE_H_L UNUSABLE P1
T_PE_H_L UNUSABLE P3
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_h_g';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_H_G UNUSABLE PG2
T_PE_H_G UNUSABLE PG1
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_h_n';

INDEX_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ --------
T_PE_H_N UNUSABLE
可以看到实际上LIST和HASH的所有索引都没有受到影响，而HASH分区则不同，所有的索引均失效，添加分区后通过HASH算法重新分布了行，那么应该ROWID也受到了影响，可以DUMP出来看看。
索引进行rebuild
alter index T_PE_H_L rebuild partition p1;
在进行HASH分区的加入分区时候最好如下：
ALTER TABLE t_pe_h
ADD PARTITION p3 update indexes; 加上UPDATE INDEXES，同时实际上HASH的分区个数应该是2的N次方，不然会分布不均匀。
然后我们测试下DROP partition，drop partition只能用于RANGE 和LIST分区方式，HASH分区不能使用：
You can drop partitions from range, list, or composite range-list partitioned tables. For hash-partitioned tables, or hash subpartitions of range-hash partitioned

tables, you must perform. a coalesce operation instead.
使用脚本：
alter table t_pe_r drop partition p1;
alter table t_pe_l drop partition p1;
然后观察：
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_l';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_R_L USABLE P2
T_PE_R_L USABLE P4
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_g';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_R_G UNUSABLE PG2
T_PE_R_G UNUSABLE PG1
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_n';

INDEX_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ --------
T_PE_R_N UNUSABLE
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_l';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_L_L USABLE P2
T_PE_L_L USABLE P4
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_g';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_L_G UNUSABLE PG2
T_PE_L_G UNUSABLE PG1
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_n';

INDEX_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ --------
T_PE_L_N UNUSABLE
可以看到普通索引，全局索引均已经失效，但是本地索引却不受影响。
如果我们带上UPDATE INDEXES会怎么样？
SQL> alter table t_pe_r drop partition p1 update indexes;

Table altered
SQL> alter table t_pe_l drop partition p1 update indexes;

Table altered

SQL>
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_l';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_R_L USABLE P2
T_PE_R_L USABLE P4
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_g';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_R_G USABLE PG2
T_PE_R_G USABLE PG1
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_r_n';

INDEX_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ --------
T_PE_R_N VALID
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_l';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_L_L USABLE P2
T_PE_L_L USABLE P4
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS,a.partition_name from dba_ind_partitions a where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_g';

INDEX_NAME STATUS PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ -------- ------------------------------
T_PE_L_G USABLE PG2
T_PE_L_G USABLE PG1
SQL> select INDEX_NAME ,STATUS from dba_indexes where lower(index_name)='t_pe_l_n';

INDEX_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ --------
T_PE_L_N VALID
可以看到加上UPDATE INDEXES 就会自动重建失效的索引。
结论：
1、如果范围分区使用maxvalue选项则报错ORA-14074: 分区界限必须调整为高于最后一个分区界限
2、如果LIST分区使用了default选项则报错ORA-14323: 在 DEFAULT 分区已存在时无法添加分区
3、drop 分区不能使用在HASH分区表中，报错ORA-14255: 未按范围, 组合范围或列表方法对表进行分区，如果要减少一个HASH分区表中的分区需要用ALTER TABLE ... COALESCE PARTITION
4、HASH分区进行ADD PARTITION操作，普通索引，本地索引，全局索引都会失效，除非使用UPDATE INDEXES，但是LIST、RANGE分区不受影响
5、LIST,RANGE分区进行DROP PARTITION操作全局索引及普通索引会失效，但是LOCAL索引不受影响。除非使用UPDATE INDEXES.
6、如果想要为全局索引增加分区，那这个操作只能对HASH分区的全局有效，ORA-14640: 添加/合并索引分区操作只对散列分区的全局索引有效，但是DROP全局索引的分区对HASH\LIST\RANGE均有效。